NEWS:


Urban and deprived residents could find their voices relatively unheard, according to new research by the International Longevity Centre- UK.

Press release

The research finds that voters in urban areas are less interested in politics and significantly less likely to vote in all or most local elections than those in rural areas, although much of his effect appeared driven by higher levels of disadvantage and inequality in urban areas.

Ahead of the local elections and referendum on a new voting system, new research, ‘Can Localism work for Older People in Urban Environments?’ by the International Longevity Centre- UK (ILC-UK) (1) highlights the risk that those who are less well-off will not have their voice heard in this week’s local elections and national referendum.

The research also argues that the success of the Government’s Localism Bill depends on equitable access to social networks and information, as well as substantial levels of political interest and community engagement. But it finds that these are lacking for some people, particularly older people, living in urban communities.

ILC-UK undertook critical analysis of the British Social Attitudes Survey (2) to inform a new research paper on the impact of the Big Society and Localism Bill (3) on older people living in urban environments. The analysis found that:

  • Older people in urban areas were not as interested in politics – twice as many older people in urban areas said they had little or no interest in politics (35%) compared to older rural residents (18%).
  • Not only were adults of all ages in urban areas less interested in politics, they were significantly less likely to vote in all or most local elections than those in rural areas.
  • While older people are generally more interested in politics than working age people, older people in urban areas show around the same degree of interest in politics as working age people in rural areas.

The report finds that disadvantage drives several of these differences. It finds that having no qualifications or living in social housing negatively predict political interest and voting in local elections – more urban residents share these characteristics than rural residents.

In publishing this report, ILC-UK recommends that:

  • Policy-makers should seek to strengthen interpersonal, intergenerational, and multigenerational networks, particularly in urban areas.
  • Policy making under Localism should find a way to ensure that decisions reflect the diversity of the electorate.
  • Local and central Government should engage in a programme of activity to encourage community engagement among more hard to reach groups.
  • The Government should introduce minimum standards for the provision of timely information should be set in place to facilitate engagement among older and more deprived residents.
  • Community meetings, referendums and other opportunities to participate in the Big Society in urban areas should be structured around the specific needs of older people to ensure adequate representation.
  • The National Planning Framework, which will provide guidance for local development, should include provision for housing an ageing population and ensuring the adequate provision of affordable housing.

Baroness Greengross, Chief Executive of ILC-UK said “As the Localism Bill reaches its final Parliamentary stages, it is vital that the Government considers how it can ensure that it raises participation from hard to reach groups and foster intergenerational trust and cooperation, elements that are required to ensure that decisions taken on service provision and development reflect the needs of people of all ages”

Dr Dylan Kneale, Senior Researcher at ILC- UK added “Ahead of this week’s elections, this research shows that we must make a real effort to engage with more disadvantaged urban residents in the political process. We can’t risk a situation where the voices of the poorest urban residents are not heard.”

The research also finds that:

Access to information and services

  • Older people in urban areas are significantly less likely to have access to the internet at home (two-fifths do) than older people in rural or suburban areas (over half do).
  • Older people across all areas are significantly less likely to have access to the internet at home than people under 65. Under half of older people across all areas have access to the internet at home compared to over three-quarters of people under 65. Even fewer older people actually use the internet.
  • Older people in urban areas are more likely to be dependent on public transport to reach local shops and services than in rural areas (24% versus 8%), and are more likely to report that there are areas within a mile of their home that they are afraid to walk through (61% versus 33%).
  • These findings are of concern as there is little detail in the Localism Bill on standards for ensuring access to information and new decision making structures.

Intergenerational relations and Big Society

  • Older people in urban areas are more likely to agree or agree strongly that young people do not have respect for British values, almost 90% do.
  • But, working age people (under 65) in urban areas appear more sympathetic to older people continuing in the workforce and to raising the benefits given to pensioners.
  • Nevertheless, these findings are of concern as they suggest that the quality of intergenerational relations in urban areas may be lower than in rural areas. To make the Localism Bill work and ensure that no group or generation loses out, good intergenerational cooperation is needed.

Many of our findings reflect wider concerns about the ability of less advantaged people to participate in decision making structures, and to lobby for the continuation of services upon which they may be reliant, without clear guidance and minimum standards in place for the provision of information.

ENDS

CONTACT

For further information contact David Sinclair or Dylan Kneale: 02073400440. davidsinclair@ilcuk.org.uk

The report is available to download below.

NOTES
ILC-UK is the leading independent think-tank in the UK tackling issues of longevity, ageing and demographic change. We are part of the International Longevity Centre Global Alliance. We have 12 partners across the globe. For more information, please visit the ILC-UK website www.ilcuk.org.uk or our blog http://blog.ilcuk.org.uk/
British Social Attitudes survey is a cross-sectional survey collected by the National Centre for Social Research. The report used data from the 2009 and 2008 sweeps.
The Localism Bill includes measures to reform the power of Local Authorities, changes to the delivery of local services, and changes to the way that planning and development decisions are made. It is currently at the House of Commons report stage and is yet to pass to the House of Lords.

TOP STORIES

Are you looking for a short-term paid role in a think tank over the summer?
The independent think tank the International Longevity Centre – UK (ILC-UK) is seeking a summer intern to start on Monday 23 July. The intern would work 4 days a week for a period of 4 weeks, with the possibility of extension.

New research ‘An Economic Analysis of Flu Vaccination’ paints a picture of lives saved and costs averted, but more needs to be done to increase uptake

Ben Franklin, Assistant Director of Research and Policy comments on the role of public policy, industry and consumer bodies in assisting the regulator to protect consumers.

On 19th June entries opened for the Innovating for Ageing initiative, a competition to identify solutions to the challenges facing vulnerable consumers.

The International Longevity Centre – UK (ILC-UK) and Just Group have analysed the submissions and created a shortlist to take forward that helps deal with ageing issues such as cognitive decline, failing physical health, loneliness and digital exclusion.

We are looking for an experienced, flexible and proactive candidate to support the Senior Management Team in managing the financials of the organisation.

CATEGORIES: